A Resource Breakdown Structure (RBS) is a plan that shows the resources needed to finish a job in an organised way. It’s like a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), but instead of focusing on the work that needs to be done, it looks at the tools that will be needed to do the job.
Usually, the following parts make up the Resource Breakdown Structure:
Major Categories: The main types of things that the project needs, like people, tools, materials, and buildings.
Subcategories: The subcategories of resources within each major category, such as types of personnel (like engineers, designers, and project managers), types of equipment (like computers, vehicles, and machinery), types of materials (like raw materials, components, and finished goods), and types of facilities. (e.g., office space, manufacturing facilities, storage facilities).
Resource split: The split of each section into specific resources, such as the number of engineers, the types of tools needed, the amount of raw materials needed, and the size and capacity of the buildings needed.
Resource Assignments: Assigning specific resources to each task or activity in the project. This shows which resources will be used for each task and how they will be distributed.
The Resource Breakdown Structure helps make sure that all the resources needed for the project are found and given to the right places. It helps make sure that everyone on the project team knows what resources are needed and that no resources are missed or used twice. It can also be used to figure out how much the project’s materials will cost.
The Resource Breakdown Structure should be looked at and changed often to represent changes in the project’s goals, scale, and resources. It should be shared with everyone who has an interest in the project, such as the team, management, customers, and partners. The Resource Breakdown Structure should also be used as a guide while the project is being done to make sure that all of the resources are being used and assigned correctly.
Key Points
– The Risk Breakdown Structure is similar to a thorough list or map of all the potential hazards that a project may encounter.
– It divides these hazards into smaller, more manageable bits, much like dividing a large problem into smaller pieces to solve it more effectively.
– Consider it like the branches of a tree, with the trunk being the primary danger and the branches being lesser pieces of that risk. This framework assists in identifying risks in many aspects of the project, such as time, money, or resources, providing a clearer picture of possible difficulty spots.
– It’s similar to preparing a list of all the possible outcomes so that you may be prepared for each one.
